Foreign Policy
- Israel - The policy seems to be to support Israeli Government terrorism through thick and thin.
Billions of dollars from the US government to support and provide arms to a government which bombs refugee camps. People killed by US supplied arms.
At a demonstration in front of the Israeli Consulate in San Francisco signs compared Perez to Hitler.
The US condemns terrorism, yet supports a government which clearly engages in terrorist acts.
UN Security Council Resolution 425 calls for Israel to get out of Lebanon. The US could make Israel's compliance a condition for more aid - but does Mr. Christopher have the guts for this?
For more information, see The Israel, Lebanon Conflict at Yahoo
- Cuba - The United States is out on a limb on this. Not only are Mexico, Canada and most European nations against the US policy here - but even former President Charter and the New York Times have commented on the stupidity of current US policy.
Do Americans get all the news about Cuba? Check
The Cuban Downing of the Planes -
Note from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Cuba - Havana, February 25, 1996 - and more non-mainstream media information on Cuba -
Madeline Albright rages in the UN about International Law but seems to forget US government assassination attempts on Castro - is this also a violation of International law? The bottom line is that the US is needlessly out on a limb on Cuba policy.
Does the State Department's Cuba site have anything to do with truth?
- China - An opportunity to be lost? It is expected that the economy of China will be larger than the US in the 21st Century. The extent to which US companies participate is being determined now. Asking China to annually grovel for "Most Favored Nation" status is a joke and an insult that America may come to regret. No business can make long range plans when the terms may change from year to year. An attitude of humility and respect might be more appropriate in dealing with the Chinese. If the United States wishes the Chinese to respect human rights it might be better to start at home and concentrate at creating a "culture of respect for citizens" in police departments in the United States and stop self riotously lecturing the Chinese. California prison labor is ok, but Chinese is not?
Neither the UAW nor
The Heritage Foundation seems impressed with The Clinton Administration's handling of the situation. Will Bill Clinton go down in history as the President who lost the China market for American business?
Is the issue of jobs for Americans being disguised as a "human rights" issue?
See Rep. Bereuter's Remarks of May 29, 1996.
- Arab countries and the Middle East - Is the new "War on Terrorism" a codeword for spreading US influence in the Middle East?
It is easy to see how people in Iran could view the United States as the "Great Satin". Seems like the United States (as all military powers before) wants to use its power to dictate to other countries how they should run their affairs. Instead of viewing "terrorist acts" as threats to US interests which need to be stopped with increasingly Fascist responses, it might be more useful to try and understand more about why people risk their lives to strike at the United States. Government promoted anti Islamic, anti Arab remarks do little to increase harmony in the world and only increase the likelihood of "holly wars".
The basic theme of US foreign policy seems to be short term expediency over actions which support the principles under which the United States was founded - perhaps this is the legacy of
Henry Kissinger.
Noam Chomsky (Hope for the Future)
and Michael Parenti
both provide an articulate perspective on US Foreign Policy which seems to be missed in most daily newspapers.
Strategic Assessment: The Internet -
provides a look at actual and potential impact of the Internet on domestic and foreign
politics and international conflict from the point of view of a U.S. Department of Defense analyst.