Bismillah irrahman irrahim ******************************* THE ISLAMIC DINAR. Introduction. ******************************* I would like to introduce you to some general ideas and guidelines to the very important issue concerning all the Muslims today, which is the abandonment of Riba. Allah, subhana wa ta'ala, says in Qur'an: "wa hallal allahul bai'a wa harramul riba"; which means: "Allah has permitted trade and forbidden usury (Riba)". Also Allah says in the Qur'an: "ia yuha alladhina 'amanu uttaqu Allaha wa dharu ma baqiya mina riba, ina kubtum muminin. Fain lam taf'alum, fadhadhu biharbin mina Allahi wa Rasulih", which means, "O you who believe! Fear Allah and give up what remains of your demand for usury, if you are indeed believers. If you do not, take notice of war from Allah and His Messenger". The issue of the dinar relates to the prohibition of Riba, the chronic economic paralysis of Muslim countries, to the destruction of the Khalifate, the unity of the Ummah under one currency and what is most important the restoration of the fundamental pillar of zakat. This is to say, the issues that matter to the people who want to see a Dar al-Islam and the Khalifate restored again, and among this people the sufies, who care nothing except Allah, are in the first line. The magnitude and the importance of this issue comes before other, often over-stretched, minor matters. If a tiger is about to devour you, you do not entertain yourself with a mosquito. The enemies of the Islamic Dinar are the enemies of the Sunnah of Rasul, salallahu alaihy wa salaam. They have to denounce the practice of the Sahaba and the practice of the Ummah for all the centuries since the beginning until the fall of the Khalifate. They have tried in the past to convince all of us that the Banks were halal (like Muhammad Abdou and his followers did). Then they came with the Islamic Bank, which is like Islamic whisky. But as the fallacy of Islamic Banking, was openly revealed (by the Sufies) and as their practices have became known as fraudulent and usurious (in Islamic Law) despite their deceitful use of Islamic terminology (such as qirad, shirkat, kira, etc.), they have tried to content everybody with the cynical idea of "being practical in a sinful world". They have justified the use of paper money, even in Muslim countries, with false doctrines and meditated silence. While the Muslims all over the world are still today being cheated and robbed by a monetary system totally unjust, deceitful and contrary to Islamic practices, based banking paper-money, a methodical cover of puritanical and esoteric doctrines borrowed from decaying Christianity and a noisy silence over the important issues was spread with scientific precision, sometimes using false 'alims and false sufies, to keep the Muslims busy by a self-inflicted sense of guilt (a doctrine of 'your iman is not good enough') and trivial matters of no importance, or its opposite reaction, a fanatical radicalism deprived of real aims. Apart from the very ignorant who still believe that Islamic Banking is Islamic or believe that paper money is modern and wonderful to people, is there any justification to remain passive, silent in a kind of dispassionate helplessness, on this well known subject? The answer must be an emphatic NO. We cannot let the helplessness of few lifeless people contaminate our spirit. We should not accept those who say: "I believe in it, but it cannot be done or it cannot be done today. We are waiting [for a signal]". They are ignorant about the nature of the deen. Leave these people alone. Keep the company of the Sufies that are going ahead. This are people whose carelessness about the world let them see through. And where other are suspended in sea of impossibilities and doubts, the Sufies will show you the easy way to victory. As sufies, we undertake the obligations of all the Muslims in our hearts and deal with them as if they were ours. We cannot be bother with our ego. That is why we simply forget it. Sufies believe, out of their taqwa, that we are responsible for everything without excuse. Yet, they know that they are incapable for such task, out of their own dependence of Him. But they know and act accordingly, that Allah is capable. And by His Power, out of their hope in Him, they can achieve their obligations and show others how to do it. We will fulfil our duties by the authority of Allah, subhana wa ta'ala. We do not fear the state, or the banking system, or anything else. We, only fear Allah. Our path is a path of showing easiness towards Allah; of showing the Muslims that by Allah, and by our obedience to Him, that is what we call by "giving up", we become in charge of our affairs. I recall the title of the book of the great wali of Allah and Shaykh of our tariqa Shaykh Ahmad Ibn Ataillah, may Allah be pleased with him, "The Book of illumination on the Giving Up of the Management of Affairs". The title is enough. It also reminds me of what Allah says in the Qur'an in Surat al-Layla: "fa amma man a'ata wa attaqa wa saddaqa bil husna, fasanuiassiruhu lil iusra wa amma man bakhila wa astaghna wa kadhdhaba bil husna, fasanuiassiruhu lil 'usra". which means, "if you give sadaqa and fear Allah and you believe in the Goodness [of Allah], we will facilitate your way to easiness. But if you are mean and [you think] you are self-sufficient [from Allah] and you do not believe in the Goodness [of Allah], we will facilitate your way to difficulty. The path of tasawwuf is a path of easiness. This is opposite of the people whose path and teaching are full of doubts, hidden meanings, waiting for the Mahdi and unknown mysteries. Our path is certainty and increase of certainty. We firmly believe "la hawla wa la quwatta illah billah". There is no two powers, but only The One. Kufr and the kaffirs have no power. Their illusion of power depends on us, the Muslims, in as much as we are not fulfilling our duties. The power of Muslims is borrowed from Allah, by His Will, as we obey and submit to Him. Kaffirs are to us, just like flies are to people. They are there to keep us clean. But if we are dirty they become a bother to us. So the issue is really in our hands without excuse. You should nevertheless, be aware that there are non-Muslim and some Muslims that when they hear that the [other] Muslims are introducing the Islamic dinar as their medium of exchange, they will twist in themselves in real agony, as they rightly fear that their petty worries and trivial fantasies are being blown apart by the real imperatives and force of a Resurgent Islam. But don't worry, it will be very easy to identify them, because their agony will show in their passivity and lack of interest for what is happening. This is because, as Shaykh Darqawi, may Allah be pleased with him, told us, they are dead. The present Prime Minister of Turkey, may Allah bless all the Turkish people and through their resurgence give us a Khalifa, His Excellency Dr. Necmettin Erbakan has brought the matter of the Islamic Dinar to the frontline of the Islamic discourse to a point of no-return. He has pledged the will and commitment of the Muslims of Turkey to the establishment of the Islamic Dinar as the currency of an Economic Union of Muslim Countries. He astonished many people, who had looked with contempt and dismissive condescending what the sufies have been saying and struggling for for a long time. Many, who had pledged themselves to the folly of Islamic Banking and the nonsense of what they call Islamic Economics, have, with their paralysed silence, shown us that they do not know how to react to it. They are now out of touch with the dynamic and powerful Raising of Islam which they seem to be unable to see or taste. They now only see themselves in front of the abyss of wasted good will in prosaic phobias and irrelevant matters, they created for their gullible followers. Although some will prefer not to look IF they can get away with it. I am proud to say that the dinar that Dr. Erbakan hold in his hand when he first publicly pronounced his intentions in the Blue Mosque of Istanbul, surrounded by the takbirs of our excited and committed Turkish brothers, was a dinar struck under the authority of the Amir of the Spanish Community, he himself a long-time devoted Sufi of the Shadili-Darqawi- Murabitun tariqah, in the city of Granada, may Allah reward him by His Generosity for doing that. I, like all the people present, will remember forever the moment when His Excellency Dr. Necmettin Erbakan and my Master, Shaykh Abdalqadir as-Sufi al-Murabit, together by the hand, proclaim from the podium, to the cheerful people of Istanbul and the shocked Turkish media, in the Opening Ceremony of the I International Conference of Islamic Thinking in Istanbul on May of last year, that the dinar was the currency of the Muslims. By the Mercy of Allah, all the sufies stand together in this point of the introduction of the Dinar. I recall the words of the wali of Allah and the Light of Fatih in Istanbul, Shaykh Mahmud Effendi, who, surrounded by his murids and others, as my Master Shaykh Abdalqadir As-Sufi showed him the dinar and the dirham that our community in Germany was putting in circulation, said: "This is the money of the Muslims. It is very important. We should do it very quickly". Let all the sufies, of all the tariqahs, united by the love on the Rasul, salallahu alaihi wa salaam, let us be ahead and take upon ourselves to be the beginners of the introduction of the dinar and the dirham, only for the pleasing of Allah, subhana wa ta'ala, by the fulfilment His Command, and so that everybody else can follow. The following simple introduction presented in parts will be followed by deeper analysis and guidelines for the abandonment of Riba and the establishment of complete and self-transformative Islamic Trading. There will be also practical guidelines of how you can obtain the coins and how you can start using them. ****************** THE ISLAMIC DINAR. ****************** Introducing the Islamic Dinar and Dirham by Umar Vadillo ---------------------------------------- From the beginning of Islam until the fall of the Khalifate the currency of the Muslims has been the Islamic Dinar and Dirham. THE HISTORY OF THE ISLAMIC DINAR AND DIRHAM In the beginning the Muslims used gold and silver by weight and the dinar and dirhams that they used were made by the Persians. The first dated coins that can be assigned to the Muslims are copies of silver dirhams of the Sasanian Yezdigird III, struck during the Khalifate of Uthman, radiallahu anhu. These coins differ from the original ones in that an Arabic inscription is found in the obverse margins, normally reading "in the Name of Allah". Since then the writing in Arabic of the Name of Allah and parts of Qur'an on the coins became a custom in all mintings made by Muslims. Under what was known as the coin standard of the Khalif Umar Ibn al-Khattab, the weight of 10 dirhams was equivalent to 7 dinars (mithqals) In the year 75 (695 CE) the Khalif Abdalmalik ordered Al- Haddjadj to mint the first dirhams, thus he established officially the standard of Umar Ibn al-Khattab. In the next year he ordered the dirhams to be minted in all the regions of the Dar-al-Islam. He ordered that the coins be stamped with the sentence: "Allah is Unique, Allah is Eternal". He ordered the removal of human figures and animals from the coins and that they be replaced with letters. Gold and silver coins remained official currency until the fall of the Khalifate. Since then, dozens of different paper currencies were made in each of the new post-colonial national states created from the dismemberment of Dar al-Islam. This command was then carried on throughout all the history of Islam. The dinar and the dirham were both round, and the writing was stamped in concentric circles. Typically on one side it was written the "tahlil" and the "tahmid", that is, "la ilaha illah Allah" and "alhamdulillah"; and on the other side was written the name of the Amir and the date. Later on it became common to introduce the blessings on the Prophet, salallahu alayhi wa salem, and sometimes, ayats of the Qur'an. THE QUESTION OF PAPER MONEY Allah says in the Qur'an: "And amongst the People of the Book there are those who, if you were to entrust them with a treasure (qintar), he would return it to you. And amongst them is he who, if you were to entrust him with a dinar would not return it to you, unless you kept standing over him. Qur'an (3,75) Qadi Abu Bakr Ibn al-Arabi, the greatest authority on Qur'anic Law wrote in his famous "Ahkam al-Qur'an" about this ayat: "The benefit that can be taken from this is the prohibition of entrusting the People of the Book with goods". Qadi Abu Bakr said: "The question concerning entrusting property is legislated by the text of Qur'an." This means that the ayat is a legal judgement of absolute validity and of the greatest importance to the deen. Entrusting wealth to non-Muslims is not allowed, but furthermore, taking a non-Muslim as a partner outside Dar al- Islam (where we stand over them) is extremely restricted, because they might cheat or might use our wealth in forbidden transactions. Since paper-money is a promise of payment, can it be permitted to trust the issuers while they hold the payment (our property) outside our jurisdiction? History has also demonstrated repeatedly that paper money has been a permanent instrument of default and cheating the Muslims. In addition, Islamic Law does not permit the use of a promise of payment as a medium of exchange. WHAT IS THE ISLAMIC DINAR AND DIRHAM? According to Islamic Law... The Islamic Dinar is a specific weight of gold equivalent to 4.3 grammes. The Islamic Dirham is a specific weight of silver equivalent to 3.0 grammes. Umar Ibn al-Khattab established the known standard relationship between them based on their weights: "7 dinars must be equivalent to 10 dirhams. "How can I use them? 1.- I can save them because they are wealth in themselves. 2.- I can pay zakat and dowry as they are requisite within Islamic Law. 3.- I can buy and sell with them since they are a legitimate medium of exchange. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE DINAR AND THE DIRHAM Ibn Khaldun wrote in his book "Al-Muqaddimah": "The Revelation undertook to mention them and attached many judgements to them, for example zakat, marriage, and hudud, etc., therefore within the Revelation they have to have a reality and specific measure for assessment [of zakat, etc.] upon which its judgements may be based rather than on the non- shari'i [other coins]. Know that there is consensus [ijma] since the beginning of Islam and the age of the Companions and the Followers that the dirham of the shari'ah is that of which ten weigh seven mithqals [weight of the dinar] of gold. ... The weight of a mithqal of gold is seventy-two grains of barley, so that the dirham which is seven-tenths of it is fifty and two-fifths grains. All these measurements are firmly established by consensus." The primordial uses of the Dinar and the Dirham are: TO SAVE Gold or silver are the most stable currency the world has ever seen From the beginning of Islam until today, the value of the Islamic bimetallic currency has remained surprinsingly stable in relation to basic consumable goods: A chicken at the time of the Prophet, sallallahu alaihi wa sallam, cost one dirham; today, 1,400 years later, a chicken costs approximately one dirham. In 1,400 years inflation is zero. Could we say the same about the dollar or any other paper currency in the last 25 years? In the long term the bimetallic currency has proved to be the most stable currency the world has ever seen. It has survived, despite all the attempts by governments to transform it into a symbolic currency by imposing a nominal value different from its weight. Reliability. Gold cannot be inflated by printing more of it; it cannot be devalued by government decree, and unlike paper currency it is an asset which does not depend upon anybody's promise to pay. Portability and anonymity of gold are both important, but the most significant fact is that gold is an asset that is no-one else´s liability. All forms of paper assets: bonds, shares, and even bank deposits, are promises to repay money borrowed. Their value is dependant upon the investor's belief that the promise will be fulfilled. As junk bonds and the Mexican peso have illustrated, a questionable promise soon loses value. Gold is not like this. A piece of gold is independent of the financial system, and its worth is underwritten by 5,000 years of human experience. TO PAY ZAKAT Zakat cannot be paid with a promise of payment Zakat can only be paid with tangible merchandise, called in Arabic 'ain. It cannot be paid with a promise to pay or a debt, called in Arabic dayn. From the begining the zakat was paid with dinars and dirhams. Most significant is that the payment of zakat was never allowed in paper money during all the ottoman period right until the fall of the Khalifate. Shaykh Muhammad Illish (1802-1881), the great maliki cadi, said that if you were to pay zakat with paper-money only its value as merchandise (dayn), that is, its value as paper can be accepted. Therefore, its nominal value is irrelevant as payment of zakat. Shaykh Illish wrote: "If the Zakat was obligatory by considering its substance as a merchandise, then the nisab would not be stipulated according to its value but according to its substance and its quantity, as is the case with silver, gold, grain or fruits. Since its substance [paper] is irrelevant [in value] in respect to the Zakat, then it should be treated as the copper, iron or other similar substances.' Zakat cannot be paid in paper money (American dollars for example). This is a serious innovation (bid'ah) in one of the five pillars the deen of Islam. For those not familiar with the fiqh on zakat I will quote from the Se'adet-i Ebediyye or "Endless Bliss" written by Husain Hilmi Effendi (the founder of Ihlas Foundation) in 1956. It is not a book of the maliki fiqh [which we use], but it is a book supported by the people who use the name "Ahl al-Sunnah" and it can enlighten the understanding of our "de facto" 'alims. For those who do not know about this book, this is preface note of the book itself: "Se'adet-i Ebediyye is a book prepared according to the Hanafi madhhab. There is not any knowledge or word, which contradicts the creed of "Ahl-i Sunnat and Jama'at in this book." Here are the relevant quotes: "the zakat of paper money is to be given in gold. It cannot be given in paper money" "It is haram to accept any money which is not gold or silver as zakat or kharaj [from Harun Rashid]" "Ignorant people say, "Paper money cannot be compared to bonds [which are not acceptable as payment of zakat] written out between two people. It is day's currency. It has become attested universally. It is indispensable to give it today." They should not be believed. Something cannot be universal, indispensable or permissible by the word of us the populace." "In none of the books written or the fatwas given during that long period [the Ottoman Empire] has it been said or stated that the zakat could be given in paper money." The return to the payment of zakat in gold and silver is an essential part of the re-establishment of Islam. We must be particularly aware of those who say 'it is not practical to pay zakat in gold and silver'. This is a false argument, not the issue. The issue is the fulfilment of the Allah's Law. We must work towards the establishment of the Law. The return of the gold Dinar, like the return of the Khalifate, may or may not appear to be practical yet no Muslim can deny that these are our obligation. TO BUY AND SELL The Dinar and the Dirham are the currency of the Islamic UmmahNo more hundreds of different paper currencies diseased with inflation. A piece of gold is equaly valid wherever you are in the world. In the past, Muslims were able to travel throughout the Islamic world and trade with dinars, as theycould at home. From the XV century onwards the Europeans started to introduce the banking promisory note in Muslim lands. Paper money gave European traders an incredible purchasing power that overwhelmed and eventually surpassed the Muslims' superiority in world trading. Gold was money well into this century, and for at least two centuries before, most bonds, including govern-mental ones, were gold bonds. But after the First World War, since the financial demands of the war led governments to print paper money in excess, the convertability to gold was first suspended for the most part, and finally terminated. How important is the dinar and the dirham to the deen of Islam? Al-Qurtubi (d. 1273), one of the greatest commentators of Qur'an, wrote in his renowned Tafsir about the following ayat of Qur'an, ."O you who believe! Obey Allah and obey the Messenger and those in command among you. ..." Qur'an, 4, 59 that the ayat is an order to "obey the Sultan with respect to seven things: the minting of the dinar and the dirham, fixing weights and measures, legal judgements, Hajj, Jumu'ah, the two Eids and Jihad." The minting of the dinar and the dirham is therefore the first obligation of the Sultan to be commanded and to be followed FATWA ON PAPER MONEY Paper Money is not a legal medium of exchange If paper money is a debt representing a merchandise (dayn): The debt must have a definition of what is owed. But even if it is defined as a proper debt, a debt cannot be used as a medium of exchange. Concerning paper-money as wealth entrusted to non-Muslims, this is not allowed. If paper money is a tangible merchandise ('ayn): Its value corresponds only to its weight as paper. Equally we take the value of the dinar by its weight not by its nominal value. Either way, paper money cannot be accepted as a medium of exchange. An Instrument of tyranny We have heard economists saying: "We need a flexible currency" "We need a currency that can be expanded or contracted according to the needs of the economy" "An increase in currency will quicken industry" These are all fallacies to justifiy the insolvency of the issuers of the notes in order to avoid their obligations to pay. There is, in truth, a great charm in the idea of being able to pay off all our needs, satisfy all the government expenses and to make the whole communtiy prosperous, just by printing a few characters on bits of paper. But when a man is capable of believing that, he will believe anything. Another fallacy to justify theft is to say:"It is an emergency" indeed a war can influence anybody to accept what appear to be solutions. After the emergency comes the semi-emergency of a crisis, or an almost-emergency time or an almost-normal time. In every case our individual rights are no longer in our hands. Any failure to repay in whole or in part what is due by the promissory note is but a form of theft THE RING - The trap and decay of the Khalifate Up until the XV century the Muslims were in total charge of world trading. From then on the Europeans started to take over by the power of the ring. The ring is a simple mathematical equation, which, as mentioned by Richard Wagner in his famous opera, gives total power to the person who uses it, although it contains a curse: "Whoever uses it, will never be loved". Power was not wielded by gold, but by storing it in a guarded cave. People slaved to mine it, but were ruled by whoever possessed the ring. This mathematical formula attached to debt and symbolic money destroyed the Muslim Khalifate. This mathematical formula is what banking is all about. The formula needs a pre-condition: the existence and acceptance of symbolic money. Then it consists of lending 'at interest' symbolic money they [the banks] do not have. By lending 20 times more than they have, all repayments of 10% become in accounting like 200% (20x10%). We pay 10%, but they collect 200%. But if everyone seems to win, who is the loser? The losers are all passive holders of the currency who will suffer the inflation originated by the money created out of nothing. That is it ! Once the Muslims accepted their symbolic money they inadvertedly authorised the magical system which gave the banks a previously undreamed of world dominion. The ring did not just conquer the states, its power was so fascinating, that it transformed the states into banks. And the States became banks This convenient method of 'coining credit', was soon discovered by the governments and they issued their own promissory notes in paymnet of their expenses; a resource the more useful, because it was the only mode in which they were able to borrow money without paying interest, their promises to pay on demand being, in the estimation of the holders, equivalent to money in hand. The governments incapable of containing their own expanding deficits then created the legal money. The law of legal tender established that all money issued by the issuing authority must be accepted by force in payment of any debt. The legal money abolished the contractual law that guaranteed the freedom of the people to choose and imposed on the citizens an artificial currency with a legal value established by the government. This convenient method of 'coining credit', was soon discovered by the governments and they issued their own promissory notes in payment of their expenses; a resource the more useful, because it was the only mode in which they were able to borrow money without paying interest In the beginning there was gold... then paper was issued as a promise to pay in gold and finally the issuers broke their promise and transformed paper into a non-redeemable official note. We should now reverse the process... governments should freely convert their currency and finally eliminate all paper currencies MONEY, A COMMODITY OR A SYMBOL Until the beginning of the twentieth century the most popular and universal medium of exchange was gold and silver coins. Currency was considered to be as flexible as any other merchandise. People responding to their own particular needs demanded the coins and also offered them, thus their market value was established daily.The debate that divides the defenders of gold and silver and their adversaries is not new, it has been going on for more than three centuries. Today money is represented by pieces of paper as non- redeemable official notes whose quantity can be increased at will. This symbolic money originated from private contracts or promises to pay issued by goldsmiths and later by banks. Money is a symbol and not a commodity: "It is the denomination of the currency of the money that men regard in bargaining, not the quantity of silver. It is the public authority upon the metal that makes it money" (Nicolas Barbon, 1696) "Money is a symbol of a thing and represents it" (Charles-Louis de Montesquieu, 1748) "Money is the symbol of all commodities" (François-Veron de Forbonnais, 1776) "All monetary functions which are usually performed by gold and silver coins, may be performed as effectively by a circulation of inconvertible notes having no value but that ficticious and conventional value... they derive from law" (John Fullarton, 1848) Money is a commodity and not a symbol: "Silver and gold, coined or uncoined, though they are used for a measure of all other things, are no less a commodity than oil, tobacco, cloth or stuffs" (Josiah Child, 1689) "Money is not a mere symbol, for it is itself wealth; it does not represent values, it is their equivalent" (Guillaume-François Le Trosne, 1777) "Gold and silver have value as metals before they are money. The coins which today have a merely ideal denomination are in all nations the oldest; once upon a time they were all real, and because they were real people reckoned with them." (Fernando Galiani, 1803) "The false definitions of money may be divided in two main groups: those which make it more and those which make it less, than a commodity" (Wilhelm Roscher, 1858) Some Common FALSE OBJECTIONS to Gold & Silver as a medium of exchange In any debate about gold and silver, certain objections are repeatedly raised by opponents of monetary freedom, even though those objections have been refuted many times before. Some of these objections are: · There is not enough gold; · Russia and South Africa, since they are the principal producers, will benefit; · Gold is subject to undesirable speculative inf- luences; · Gold will produce instability in prices. The first objection, that there is not enough gold, is based upon a misunderstanding of the price of gold. It assumes that the present exchange ratio between a weight of gold and notes is the exchange ratio that must prevail when the gold is made a medium of exchange. Such obviously is not the case. To put it simply, lower prices under gold currency will eliminate the necessity for larger sums. One could buy a suit that costs 400 paper units with 20 gold equivalents at a different exchange ratio. The second objection, concerning Russia and South Africa is equally groundless. It could be considered an advantage, in the same way oil or a fertile soil could be equally, in comparative terms. The amount of gold already taken out of the earth in the last two thousand years is already superior to the known but unminted reserves of Russia and South Africa. The unminted reserves of Russia are estimated to be about 250 million ounces which is less than what the United States already has in minted reserves. The demand for gold as a medium of exchange will release the existing hoardings, a process which is already in vogue in most central banks. The third objection, that gold is subject to speculative influence and therefore too unstable to be used as a medium of exchange, is also false. During the 70's, gold became a major hedge against inflation. The run-up in gold prices from $35 to $850 per ounce came as a result of fears about the value of paper-money and developing international crises. People who object to gold because it is speculative confuse cause and effect. The real speculation is provoked by an irredeemable paper- money system and people who logically want to protect themselves from it. The fourth objection says that gold will produce instability in prices. Comparing prices in gold in the U.S. in 1833 with 1933, just prior to the abandoning of the domestic gold standard, the index of wholesale commodity prices increased only 0.9 percent in one hundred years! Since then the index increased 350% by 1971 when President Nixon, declaring international bankruptcy, announced that no more gold would be given in exchange for dollars. In the last twenty years the index has gone up around 400%. Gold is therefore stable and fit to be money, and history has shown us that there is no money more unstable or unfit than paper-money. The EFFECT of the Dinar and the Dirham on Business Paper-money, which does not render any service except in exchange for something productive, is made artificially productive by interest. On the other hand, every genuine enterprise, like the use of a house or a manufacturing process, can only be productive by the services rendered to society. Interest competes and wins over genuine enterprises profitable to society. The genuine business has to pay the interest out of the profit from a genuine service to society, but the bank makes profit out of the interest through the artificial expansion of the money lent. The final result is that the higher the interest rates the greater the destruction of 'less competitive" businesses The EFFECT of the return of the dinar and the dirham will be The shift of capital investment from the most "speculative areas" to the more productive areas.As a result a new landscape associated with the dinars and the dirhams will re-emerge, that is, the world of Islamic Trading A new re-start for trading will come about through the restoration of two of its most representative but losts institutions: the market-place which will replace supermarkets and the caravans which will replace monopolistic distribution And the return of the guilds, that is, associated independent intelligent workteams, in which the relationship master/apprentice will replace employer/employee The EFFECT of the Dinar and the Dirham on the Real Estate Today you want to buy a house and a bank will offer you a mortgage. This is how the ring distorts the operationthe house The annual rent of this house is 10% of its value but,... the same money is offered by the bank at 5%, which considering inflation is a bargain! Why would the bank be so generous, when it could rent the house and obtain the house plus a higher 10% return? This is the paradox of the ring. Out of that 5% interest the bank will make a 100% profit with the mathematics of the ring. The borrower thinks that the interest is better than paying the rent, the bank makes a higher profit out of expanding money who loses? All the holders of the newly inflated currency by its loss of value (inflation). THE HIRE-ABILITY OF MERCHANDISE A house can be rented, it is a hireable merchandise Money cannot be rented, it is a non hireable merchandise Profit and rent come only from real services to society -this is the end of speculative economy and the beginning of real prosperity to society. This is because investment will have to be directed towards real services, instead of being drawn by the artificial profit of the ring which like a parasite lives off real services.Without the mortgage, housing prices will simply find a new stability established by the equilibrium between the offer and a new demand based on what people can really pay. Imam Sahnun wrote in the great Madinan text, "Mudawwana al- Kubra", 12:46 "Money is something which it is not permissible to hire." The Practical Use of the Dinar and the Dirham In the beginning, networks of shops and individuals which will accept the gold and silver coins as a medium of exchange will be distinguished by a sign or window sticker. Just like Visa or American Express cards started to be introduced in society. Each shop will have the sticker indicating that they accept the dinar and the dirham. The transportation of gold and silver will be facilitated by a network of agencies that will allow money to be sent to any corner of the world. It will operate by a simple method of book-keeping. Just like the company Inter-flora makes available flowers all over world without needing to send the flowers physically. Equally the gold and silver could be made available in different parts of the world although only the balance between the different agencies needs to be physically transported A future use of cash cards would allow you to retrieve gold and silver from your own account in any shop of the network. Under the strong supervision of the WITO, World Islamic Trading Organisation, companies will be able to issue cards which let you retrieve money just like modern cashiers allow you to collect paper money The TRANSFERRAL of gold and silver to a third party by means of special debit cards. This is the most delicate of all questions, since many forms of transferral of money are not allowed in Islamic Law and open the door to fraudulent abuse of trust. That is why any step in this direction will need to be strongly monitored by WITO or some civil authority, to prevent the account keeper from turning into a bank by lending money and /or creating money out of nothing by expanding the credit. FREEDOM The question of money is primarily a question about freedom. When people were free to choose they universally chose gold and silver Now we are forced to accept the system of artificial money, whose legal value is determined by the State. "Money is any merchandise commonly accepted as a medium of exchange." said Imam Malik We propose to return to gold and silver They are part of the Revelation and the Sunna They offer stability and order. They are the end of political money They are the end of money manipulation THEY REPRESENT FREEDOM From: Abdalbarr Brown Murabitun of Madison, Wisconsin. America